• Vena Cava IVC Filter Lawyers- IVC Filter Helpline:   Bard and Cook IVC Filter Lawyers Lawsuits are being filed  because the IVC (Inferior Vena Cava) Filters have been linked to migration and perforation of various organs in the body. An IVC (In...

  • Omni Life Hip Apex Arc Replacement Lawyers: Omni Life Apex ARC Hip Replacement Lawyers OMNI Life Science’s ARC hip Replacement has a  chromium and cobalt ball connecting to a titanium stem, is a metal-on-metal design. This hip replacement is l...

Posts Tagged ‘Mesa’

Omni Life Hip Apex Arc Replacement Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Depuy Hip Replacement News, Omni LIfe Hip Replacement Lawsuit

Omni Life Apex ARC Hip Replacement Lawyers

OMNI Life Science’s ARC hip Replacement has a  chromium and cobalt ball connecting to a titanium stem, is a metal-on-metal design. This hip replacement is like  DePuy. The OMNI’s ARC system   has   a metal ball inside a titanium stem, resembling the femur. There are increasing reports of failure of the hip implant and out lawyers are filing lawsuit on behalf of victims with a failed hip implant.

 Florida Woman Files Omni Life Hip Replacement Lawsuit

A recipient of the implant  in Florida sued OMNI in June 2014. Her physician determined her ARC hip system caused her to develop a fibrotic and necrotic pseudo tumor and dangerous buildup of chromium, cobalt, and titanium in the blood. Her lawsuit alleges OMNI ignored the flaws in the artificial hip system, which led to its early failure.

Get An Omni Life  Hip Replacement Lawyer

Contact the Hip Replacement Helpline  We can help answer questions you may have about DePuy and Omnilife  hip replacement lawsuits.

Hip Replacements Failing | Hip Replacement Lawsuits Filed

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Biomet Hip Replacement Helpline, Depuy Hip Replacement Blog, Microport Hip replacement lawyers, Stryker Hip Replacement, Wright Hip Replacement Lawyer

Metal On Metal and Metal Components Hip Replacement Lawsuits 

 

Hip replacement implants that can cause serious injury

DePuy Orthopaedics

  • ASR XL Acetabular System
  • ASR Hip Resurfacing System

Zimmer Holdings

  • Durom Cup

Stryker Orthopaedics

  • ABG II modular-neck hip stems
  • Rejuvenate
  • Accolade

Stryker lawsuits have been consolidated into into multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the U.S. District Court of Minnesota.

 

MicroPort Orthopedics Inc.

  • PROFEMUR Neck Varus
  • Valgus CoCr 8 Degree, Part number PHAC 1254.

Biomet

  • M2a metal-on-metal hip devices

Biomet M2a Magnum hip lawsuits have been  transferred to the U.S. District Court for the North District of Indiana before the Honorable Robert L. Miller, Jr. as a consolidated  mulri district litigation. As of February 2014, at least 1,141 Biomet hip implant lawsuits had been filed. –

Wright Medical Technology Hip Replacement Lawyers

  • Conserve Plus

Lawsuits are being evaluated for individuals who have experienced problems with a Wright hip replacement and have had or been told they need Hip Revision Surgery

 Hip Replacement Lawsuits For Complications

  • Decreased Mobility- Due to device failure
  • Severe Pain in The Hip, Groin or Thigh
  • Inflammation and Swelling
  • Loosening of the Device
  • Bone Damage
  • Infections
  • Chromium and Cobalt Metal  Poisoning
  • Hip Revision Surgery Needed

 

 

 

 

 

Wright Hip Replacement Helpline | Wright Hip Replacement Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Depuy Hip Replacement Blog, Wright Hip Replacement Lawyer

Wright Hip Replacement Helpline lawyers are filing lawsuits for the faulty Wright CONSERVE line of metal hip implants and its Profemur Z Stem.

Wright Hip Replacement Lawsuits

 

Our Wright Hip Replacement lawyers are fling lawsuits for both the Conserve and Profemur Z lines of hip implants.

Wright Hip Replacement lawsuits are currently under litigation  in MDL 2329 and assigned to the Southern Georgia District Court. The lawsuits have been  combined because they shared  facts related to the “design, manufacture, marketing and performance of Wright’s Conserve line of hip implant products.”

Wright Profemur Z Hip Replacement Lawsuit Complications

  •  Hip Pain,
  • Difficulty Standing or Walking
  • Loosening of the Hip Implant
  • Fracture of the Wright Profemur hip femoral neck
  • Hip Replacement Failure
  • Additional Hip Revision Surgery
  • Aseptic lymphocytic vasculitis-associated lesions (ALVAL)
  • Metal ion exposure
  • Early device failure
  • Pseudotumors

 

 

 

 

Da Vinci Robotics Surgery Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Da Vinci Robotic Surgery lawyers, Depuy Hip Replacement Blog

Robotic Surgery Lawyers

Our Da Vinci Robotic surgery lawyers are filing lawsuit for burn injury from Robotic surgery from gynecological and Prostate surgery.

Da Vinci Surgery Complications

Burns From Robotic Surgery ?

Burns and/or tears of the intestines
Punctured blood vessels or ureters
Severe bowel injuries
Vaginal cuff dehiscence
Excessive bleeding
Death

Da Vinci Surgical Robot Lawsuits Mounting

Robotic surgery has been considered  as a safer way to have surgery than more conventional surgeries. However, there has been a  rising number of deaths and serious injuries linked to the robotic surgery, Patient lawsuits are continuing to mount.. The “da Vinci” Surgical System is a  robotic platform designed which allows surgeons to make fewer, smaller, and more precise incisions when performing surgery on patients.

If you or a loved one has been injured by this procedure call our Da Vinci Robotic Surgery Helpline today

 

DePuy Lawsuits To Stay In MDL Is Good News For DePuy Hip Replacement Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Depuy Hip Replacement Blog

Judge Granted The Request to Stay in DePuy Pinnacle MDL

File Your DePuy Pinnacle Lawsuit Today

 

The U.S. District Judge, Ed Kinkeade of the Northern District of Texas,  has granted the request to stay most of the pending DePuy Pinnacle lawsuits in multidistrict litigation  No. 2244. The stay will, most likely, remain in effect until the conclusion of the bellwether trials.  The trials are expected to begin in September 2014.

The Bellwether Trials Set The Tone Of Future Hip Replacement Settlements

Currently, there are more than 4,800 DePuy Pinnacle lawsuits pending in MDL No. 2244.

The Pinnacle Lawsuits Are  Similar to ASR hip implants

Many recipients claim that the implant devices have loosened, causing early failure of the device. There have also been many lawsuits for metallosis, or heavy metal poisoning. When the metal components of the hip devices rub against each other, the friction releases metal ions into the blood stream.

Metallosis can cause inflammation, tissue necrosis, and bone deterioration.

Complications In The Lawsuits

  •  Bone fractures,
  • Implant dislocation,
  • Metallosis

Speak to a  DePuy ASR or Pinnacle lawyer today

DePuy Settlement 8.3 Million, DePuy Lawyers Filing Immediate Lawsuits

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Depuy Hip Replacement Blog, Depuy Hip Replacement News, DePuy Pinnacle Lawsuits, Stryker Hip Replacement, Stryker Hip Replacement Lawyer

Damages of 8.3 million have been  awarded in a J&J’s DePuy hip implant case. DePuy Helpline, DePuy Hip Repalcement lawyers are filing immediate lawsuits.

By GREG RISLING, Associated Press

Updated 1:56 am, Sunday, March 10, 2013

LOS ANGELES (AP) — A jury Friday awarded $8.3 million to a former prison guard who accused Johnson & Johnson’s DePuy Orthopaedics subsidiary of knowingly marketing a faulty hip implant that was later recalled.

Jurors found that the ASR XL implant was defectively designed and caused metal poisoning and other health problems suffered by Loren Kransky after he underwent surgery in 2007.

However, the panel rejected the 65-year-old’s claim that DePuy failed to adequately warn of the risks associated with the implant, and it didn’t find the company acted with malice, prohibiting Kransky from collecting any punitive damages.

The fraud and negligence suit is the first of nearly 11,000 similar cases involving an all-metal ball-and-socket hip joint that was pulled from the market two years ago to reach trial in the United States. Others like Kransky claim the implants have left them with crippling injuries or in need of other replacement surgeries.

Johnson & Johnson has set aside about $1 billion to cover costs of the recall and lawsuits.

Plaintiff’s attorney Doug Saeltzer said the verdict bodes well for the other cases.

“The message is that these cases are valid, that the injuries are real and severe, and Johnson & Johnson and DePuy have to pay significant money for their mistakes,” Saeltzer said.

Loire Gawreluk, a DePuy spokeswoman, said the Warsaw, Ind., company plans to appeal the verdict.

“We believe ASR XL was properly designed, and that DePuy’s actions concerning the product were appropriate and responsible,” she said.

During the trial, Kransky’s lawyers told jurors that black pieces of metal flaked off the implant and caused a type of poisoning that could have killed him if the material had not been removed.

 

Brian Panish, one of Kransky’s attorneys, said during closing arguments that the company “knew this hip was defective long before Mr. Kransky got it,” the Los Angeles Times reported.

“They wanted to play Russian roulette with patients. This defendant didn’t care about patient safety,” Panish said.

Defense attorneys denied Kransky’s claims and argued he had a host of pre-existing health ailments and the hip implant didn’t make him worse.

The hip joint was sold for eight years to more than 90,000 people worldwide. New Brunswick, N.J.-based Johnson & Johnson stopped making the product in 2009 and recalled it the next year.

The artificial part is meant to replace deteriorated joints causing severe pain and limiting mobility, and is generally expected to last 10 to 20 years. With the DePuy hip implant, one in eight patients needed theirs replaced within five years.

Attorneys representing the patients claim J&J knew about the problems in 2008. The company has denied those allegations.

Johnson & Johnson, the world’s biggest provider of health care products, has issued more than 30 product recalls since 2009. Most have involved nonprescription medicines such as adult and children’s Tylenol and Motrin, but other recalls were for prescription drugs for conditions such as epilepsy or for contact lenses.

Johnson & Johnson shares rose 44 cents to $78.19 Friday.  No harm done to J & J apparently. Our DePuy lawyers are accepting cases for immediate filing in some states. Call to find out if your state has passed the statute of limitations.

 

\

 

Stryker Hip Replacement Recall Lawsuits Continue To Proceed

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Depuy Hip Replacement Blog, Stryker Hip Replacement, Stryker Hip Replacement Lawyer

Stryker hip recall lawsuits are moving forward in a consolidated litigation established in New Jersey Superior Court, Bergen County .   Judge Brian R. Martinotti has scheduled the litigation’s initial conference for February 20, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. (In re Stryker Rejuvenate Hip Stem and the ABG II Modular Hip Stem Litigation, No. 296 (N.J. Super. Ct., Bergen Cty.)

Both the Stryker Rejuvinate Stem and ABGII Modular Hip Stem were recalled and the hip replacement helpline Stryker division has had numerous calls from people suffering from a failed Stryker metal component hip replacement.

On January 17, 2013, the FDA issued a safety communication regarding metal-on-metal hip implants. The press release is an update to the agency’s evaluation of the potential complications of these devices. The update notes that all-metal implants carry risks that are unique because of the friction of their components.

Stryker has claimed the new hip replacement would:

  • Rejuvenate hips were first made available by Stryker in February 2009
  • increased stability,
  • better mobility,
  • superior fit over other hip replacement implants on the market.

Apparently this is not the case as it was necessary to recall the implants and lawsuits are flooding in. Get an experienced Stryker lawsuit Lawyer at the Stryker Hip Replacement Help division of Hip Replacement Helpline

Thousands of people have been filing Stryker Hip Replacemant lawsuits like Laray Johnson, a resident of Alabama. He received a Stryker Rejuvenate implant in his right hip on March 22, 2011. He then received a Rejuvenate implant in his left hip on June 24, 2011. This was a year prior to the voluntary Stryker hip recall. Mr Johnson began to experience substantial pain and discomfort around the area of the implants.

Thousands are filing lawsuits and we hear from many every day with telling us about  device deterioration and corrosion,  serious problems, bone fractures, metallosis, tissue damage, and severe pain.

Call us for a Stryker lawyer today.

Stryker Hip Replacement Lawsuit Update, Stryker Hip Replacement Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Depuy Hip Replacement Blog, Stryker Hip Replacement, Stryker Hip Replacement Lawyer

Stryker has recently recalled it’s Rejuvinate Hip replacement and ABG II Hip Stems due to the number of failed components causing complications. In June 2012, Stryker initiated a voluntary recall of its Rejuvenate and ABG II modular-neck hip stems. “While modular-neck hip stems provide surgeons with an option to correct certain aspects of a patient’s anatomy and hip biomechanics, we decided to voluntarily recall these modular-neck hip systems due to the potential for fretting and corrosion at the modular-neck junction which may result in ALTR (adverse local tissue reactions), as well as possible pain and/or swelling at or around the hip.” Since that date we have had  100’s of calls from people with a failed hip replacement.

The DePuy Hip Replacement Helpline announces The Stryker Hip Replacement Helpline. The mission of the new Stryker Hip Replacement Helpline is to locate all people with a failed Stryker who have required revision surgery or have been told they need revision surgery and help them file a Stryker Hip Replacement lawsuit.

New Jersey Stryker Lawsuit Update

The New Jersey Supreme Court has ruled that all cases in the state should and will be consolidated into a “multicounty litigation” in Bergen County Superior Court before Judge Brian R. Martinotti.

Stryker Hip Replacement Helpline  lawyers are filing lawsuits for injury from the newly recalled Stryker Rejuvinate Hip Replacement and ABG II Modular Stems.

A number of  patients with failed metal component  hip replacements have chosen  to file a Stryker hip replacement lawsuit after experiencing serious complications linked to the devices, and a consolidation of a number of lawsuits has taken place.

If you have been injured by a Stryker Rejuvinate Hip replacement recall  or the ABG II Modular Stems  we want to hear from you and  connect you to a  lawyer to review your medical records to see if you have a claim against Stryker for your failed hip replacement.

 

Biomet Hip Replacement MDL Update, Biomet Hip Replacement Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Biomet Hip Replacement Helpline, Depuy Hip Replacement News, Stryker Hip Replacement

DePuy Hip Replacement Helpline lawyers are  accepting faulty Biomet hip replacement clients for litigation. If you or a loved one has a faulty Biomet hip replacemant conta the Biomet Hip Replacement Helpline for  a free case evaluation.

 Biomet Magnum Hip Lawyers Appointed to Leadership Roles in MDL

Posted: 17 Dec 2012 08:17 AM PST

More than two dozen lawyers have been appointed to serve in various leadership positions in the federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) established for all Biomet M2A Magnum hip lawsuits filed in the federal court system.

These attorneys will take various actions throughout the litigation that will benefit all plaintiffs who filed a product liability lawsuit after experiencing problems with the Biomet metal-on-metal hip replacement system.

On October 2, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) ordered that all product liability lawsuits filed against Biomet in federal courts throughout the country that involve the M2A Magnum metal hip implant will be centralized for pretrial proceedings before U.S. District Judge Robert L. Miller, Jr. in the Northern District of Indiana.

Centralizing the litigation is designed to reduce duplicative discovery in dozens of cases, avoiding conflicting pretrial rulings from different judges and to serve the convenience of the parties, witnesses and Courts.

In an order (PDF) issued on December 5, Judge Miller established the organizational structure of the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee (PSC) in the Biomet MDL, appointing 22 different attorneys to serve in various roles throughout the consolidated proceedings.

The Biomet Magnum hip lawyers selected for the PSC will conduct pretrial discovery that applies to multiple cases, examine witnesses and introduce evidence on behalf of all plaintiffs at hearings and perform other tasks during pretrial proceedings that may apply to all cases in the MDL.

Judge Miller appointed Thomas R. Anapol and W. Mark Lanier to serve as Co-Lead Counsel, with Robert T. Dassow and Frederick R. Hovde appointed to serve as Liason Counsel. In addition, another six lawyers were designated to serve on the Executive Committee of the PSC.

Biotmet is another to the long list of faulty hip replacements which includes Stryker Rejuvinate, DePuy hip replacement.and Zimmer.Stryker hip replacement and ABG II modular-neck hip stems; DePuy, Inc., Smith and Nephew, plc. Biomet Inc., and Zimmer Holdings, Inc