• Da Vinci Robotics Surgery Lawyers: Robotic Surgery Lawyers Our Da Vinci Robotic surgery lawyers are filing lawsuit for burn injury from Robotic surgery from gynecological and Prostate surgery. Da Vinci Surgery Complications Burns ...

  • DePuy Pinnacle and ASR Hip Replacement Lawyers: Speak To A DePuyHip Replacement Lawyer DePuy Announces U.S. Settlement Agreement to Compensate ASR™ Hip System Patients Who Had Surgery to Replace Their ASR Hip\ According to WEB MD Nov. 20, ...

  • DePuy Hip Replacement Lawsuit News: DePuy Hip Replacement Helpline Reports The Latest DePuy Lawsuit Lawyer News DePuy ASR Hip Lawsuit Settlement News A Proposed $2.5 Billion The DePuy ASR settlement agreement provides an for a se...

Posts Tagged ‘Hip Resurfacing’

Biomet Hip Replacement MDL Update, Biomet Hip Replacement Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Biomet Hip Replacement Helpline, Depuy Hip Replacement News, Stryker Hip Replacement

DePuy Hip Replacement Helpline lawyers are  accepting faulty Biomet hip replacement clients for litigation. If you or a loved one has a faulty Biomet hip replacemant conta the Biomet Hip Replacement Helpline for  a free case evaluation.

 Biomet Magnum Hip Lawyers Appointed to Leadership Roles in MDL

Posted: 17 Dec 2012 08:17 AM PST

More than two dozen lawyers have been appointed to serve in various leadership positions in the federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) established for all Biomet M2A Magnum hip lawsuits filed in the federal court system.

These attorneys will take various actions throughout the litigation that will benefit all plaintiffs who filed a product liability lawsuit after experiencing problems with the Biomet metal-on-metal hip replacement system.

On October 2, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) ordered that all product liability lawsuits filed against Biomet in federal courts throughout the country that involve the M2A Magnum metal hip implant will be centralized for pretrial proceedings before U.S. District Judge Robert L. Miller, Jr. in the Northern District of Indiana.

Centralizing the litigation is designed to reduce duplicative discovery in dozens of cases, avoiding conflicting pretrial rulings from different judges and to serve the convenience of the parties, witnesses and Courts.

In an order (PDF) issued on December 5, Judge Miller established the organizational structure of the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee (PSC) in the Biomet MDL, appointing 22 different attorneys to serve in various roles throughout the consolidated proceedings.

The Biomet Magnum hip lawyers selected for the PSC will conduct pretrial discovery that applies to multiple cases, examine witnesses and introduce evidence on behalf of all plaintiffs at hearings and perform other tasks during pretrial proceedings that may apply to all cases in the MDL.

Judge Miller appointed Thomas R. Anapol and W. Mark Lanier to serve as Co-Lead Counsel, with Robert T. Dassow and Frederick R. Hovde appointed to serve as Liason Counsel. In addition, another six lawyers were designated to serve on the Executive Committee of the PSC.

Biotmet is another to the long list of faulty hip replacements which includes Stryker Rejuvinate, DePuy hip replacement.and Zimmer.Stryker hip replacement and ABG II modular-neck hip stems; DePuy, Inc., Smith and Nephew, plc. Biomet Inc., and Zimmer Holdings, Inc

 

 

Toning Shoes Causing Hip Fractures, Skechers Sneakers Lawyers Filing Lawsuits

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Skechers Tone Ups Hip fracture Injury lawyer, Toning Shoes Lawsuits

Toning shoes cause Hip fractures and Hip replacements are no laughing matter. With sneakers causing hip fractures and hip replacements being recalled what are we to do? Lawsuits galore for malfunctioning devices that wreck havoc on seniors. Beware and call for an injury lawyer now.

By ELISABETH LEAMY (@elisabethleamy)
Feb. 16, 2011

A new lawsuit alleges that Skecher's Shape-up shoes can cause serious injuries.

An Ohio woman is suing the company after developing stress fractures in both hips — which she blames on the shoes.

Skecher's Shape-ups have a distinctive round sole. They are marketed as toning shoes, the fastest-growing segment of the athletic shoe market.

Toning shoes are meant to help you get in shape as you walk or work. But at least one person says rather than helping them, the shoes hurt them.

Holly Ward, 38, says her routine involves physical therapy and she now has pins in her hips because of injuries she says were caused by wearing Sketcher's Shape-ups.

"The extended use of these shoes has injured me catastrophically," Ward told "Good Morning America."

Shape-ups are advertised as helping you get in shape and helping reduce pain. Kim Kardashian and former NFL quarterback Joe Montana have appeared in commercials for Shape-ups.

Ward says she wore the shoes during her work as a waitress and while on walks and developed severe pain after five months. According to her lawsuit, she had fractures in both hips near where they meet the thigh bones even though she has the healthy bone density of a young woman.
 

"The femoral bone is the strongest bone in the human body and I fractured not one but two of them without being in a car crash or any traumatic incident," she said.

Skechers and its critics do agree on one thing: Shape-ups shoes change the way you walk.

A Skechers training video advises wearers to "step forward with the middle section of your heel hitting the ground first. Roll forward onto the ball of your foot and push off with your toes."

Company Says Millions Wear Shape-Ups Without Problems

The company calls its shoes revolutionary. Ward's lawyer calls them dangerous.

"We do not know of any testing or safety studies that Skechers did to determine safety," said Ronald Johnson, Ward's attorney. "If they're going to invent a whole new way for a human being to walk, the very first thing they should do is studies to make sure that's not going to harm their customers."

Ward says the potential gain is not worth the potential risk.

ABC spoke to half a dozen orthopedists and most were skeptical that shoes alone could cause stress fractures.

Skechers told ABC that "since this lawsuit is brand new, we have not had an opportunity to review Ms. Ward's allegations … millions of people wear Shape-ups without experiencing what Ms. Ward alleges."

Sketcher sneaker lawyers are accepting sketcher sneaker injury claims for:

Foot Injuries including:
Stress Fractures, Fallen Arches, Hammer Toe, Turf Toe, Inflammation of the Forefoot, Plantar Fasciitis, and Joint Displacement.

Leg Injuries including
Strains and Sprains, Fractures, Dislocation, Joint Injuries, Shin Splints, Tendonitis, and Nerve Damage.

Head Injuries including:
Coma, Concussion, Hematomas, Brain Damage, Hemorrhage, Skull Fracture, Contusions and Blood Clots.

    Broken Hip,
    Broken Ankle,
    Broken Leg,
    Knee Injury,
    Trimalleolar Ankle Fracture,
    Muscle Strains,
    Torn Ligaments,
    Dislocated Hip,
    Ruptured Achilles Tendon,
 

 

Stryker Helpline Launches National Campaign To Locate Seniors With Recalled Stryker

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Stryker Hip Replacement

Learn About Your Stryker Hip Replacement

Many seniors have fallen victim to the new Stryker hip replacement recall. This is not metal on metal but, Metal stems and components but, has shown the same rate of complications and metal toxicity factors. Seniors must see a doctor immediately and contact our Stryker helpline for a lawyer. Revision surgery for seniors includes months of rehabilitation. Our concern for our seniors with these faulty hip replacements has lead to a massive outreach campaign to contact all seniors with this implant and their families and children to be alerted to the potential need for revision surgery and to learn about the current Stryker lawsuits.
IN July of  2012 Stryker Orthopaedics recalled the Rejuvenate Modular Hip System and ABG II Modular-neck stems due to risk of wear and  corrosion resulting in the need for additional  revision surgery.

Stryker Implant Failure is Hurting Many Seniors

We urge seniors to contact the Stryker Implant Helpline asap to get information regarding  the  early failure of the device  and the need for revision surgery

  •     Wear and corrosion at the modular-neck junction
  •     Osteolysis or bone dissolution
  •     Joint loosening and dislocation
  •     Excessive metal debris leading to metal  toxicity
  •     Inflammation of tissues
  •     Death of tissues
  •     Pain
  •     Allergic responses
  •     Broken device
  •     Adverse Local Tissue Reaction

 

 

 

Stryker Lawsuit Updates, Stryker Lawyers Propose Consolidation

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Depuy Hip Replacement News

Current news and updates regarding the Stryker Hip Replacement

Consolidation Of Lawsuits Against Stryker Are In the Works
The Logic Behind The Consolidation

Lawsuits have been filed against Stryker Orthopaedics over its defective hip implants.  Cases are under consideration for consolidation New Jersey.The  The proposal is to move for an MDL or consolidation in Bergen County Superior Court in Hackensack, N.J., Honorable Brian Martinotti, who is the judge presiding over that court, has experience overseeing Depuy ASR hip implant lawsuits.

At issue are Stryker’s Rejuvenate and ABG II modular-neck hip stems, which were marketed as a way for orthopaedic surgeons to give patients a better fit with their hip implants because they can be customized using various parts. The Rejuvenate hip offers surgeons six stems and 16 necks, and the ABG II has 10 necks and 16 stems that work together.
Metal-on-Metal Problems

The problem, however, is that the neck and stem parts have all-metal conjunctions, Stryker stated, which are to blame for complications similar to those seen in DePuy hip implant patients. Stryker patients are experiencing painful, early failure of their devices because the metal parts are grinding against each other and wearing out. Most hip implants have an average life of 15 years, but the Rejuvenate and ABG II modular-neck hip stems are failing after just months, by some reports. All-metal hip implants also have been associated with metallosis, or the poisoning of the bloodstream.

Stryker recalled the Rejuvenate and ABG II on July 6, 2012. The Rejuvenate had only been on the market since February 2009.

If you have a failed Stryker Implant contact the helpline today.

Stryker Hip Replacement Helpline, Stryker Recall Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Stories and Sharing

A Stryker Hip Replacement Helpline has been launched for victims of the latest Stryker voluntary recall of the Stryker ABG II modular-neck stem used for total hip replacement surgery and the Stryker Rejuvinate modular-neck stem hip implant. The  Stryker hip implants have been recalled due to the fact that they could fret or corrode, harming body tissue and causing pain or swelling.

Complications and Injuries that are noted include:

  •     Severe inflammatory reactions
  •     Pain in the groin
  •     Need for additional medical care and revision surgeries
  •     Breakdown of muscles, tendons and other soft tissues in and around the hip joint
  •     Loss of surrounding bone
  •     Loss of mobility

The Stryker Rejuvenate side effects  appear to be similiar to the  Metal on Metal Hip Replacements that have caused a landslide of lawsuits against DePuy Orthopedics.
While other types of hip implants such as those made by Johnson & Johnson and DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. involve a metal ball rubbing against a metal socket, the Stryker Rejuvenate products involve a metal neck inside a metal stem. It appears that lawyers are beginning to build cases against Stryker as a part of the complete metal on metal hip replacement lawsuits. Stryker does run the risk of metal toxicity as chromium and cobalt poisoning may occur.

Anyone experiencing side effects from these Stryker products is advised to call the Stryker Hip Replacement Helpline for a Stryker Hip Replacement lawyer.

 

Stryker states that the rate of complications arising from the recalled devices was "extremely low." The company based its recall decision on information collected since the products hit the market, saying it "may be predictive of a trend." It instructed patients implanted with the devices to contact their surgeon.

If you or a loved one has been injured by a Stryker Rejuvenate product  a Stryker Hip replacement Lawyer contact the Stryker Hip Replacement Helpline for a

Hip replacement lawyer.

Stryker Hip Implant Recalls, Stryker Hip Replacement Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Depuy Hip Replacement Blog

Hip replacement lawyers are accepting clients for the The Stryker ABG II modular-neck stem used for total hip replacement surgery and
The Stryker Rejuvinate modular-neck stem hip implant. Stryker recalled both of these products on July 4, 2012 because the metal of the neck and stem can corrode, releasing toxic metal ions that can damage tissue and bones around the hip implant.  This can cause severe pain, inflammation, metal poisoning (metallosis from chromium and cobalt), tissue death (necrosis), bone damage, pseudotumers, gait issues, and other serious problems. Revision surgery (to remove and replace the recalled Stryker hip product) may be required.

Hip Replacement Lawyers and the DePuy Hip Replacement Helpline has launched a special division and helpline for victims of a failed Stryker hip implant.

Styker Orthopaedics has announced a recall of the ABG II modular-neck stem hip implant. Metal-on-metal parts of the device can corrode, shed toxic nano-particles into the body, and cause severe pain, inflammation, metal poisoning (metallosis), pseudotumors, and more
What You Can Do & How a Stryker ABG II Hip Implant Lawsuit Can Help

The Stryker ABG II modular-neck stem

The Stryker ABG II modular-neck stem is a new type of multi-piece hip replacement system. When it was approved, the company claimed that its many interchangeable parts made it ideal for matching each patient’s unique biomechanics.
Although the Stryker ABG II is technically a plastic-on-ceramic hip implant, the device has a unique neck/stem junction that is a metal-on-metal design. Like other metal-on-metal hip implants (including the DePuy ASR, which was recalled in 2010), the Stryker ABG II was fast-tracked through the FDA’s approval process via the 510(k) system. The FDA allows manufacturers to avoid conducting long-term safety studies of new devices so long as they are “substantially similar” to existing devices
Stryker ABG II Recall

Stryker first warned orthopedic surgeons about the risks of the ABG II hip implant in an Urgent Field Safety Notice that was sent in May 2012. The warning advised doctors to be aware of the following severe side effects associated with the ABG II hip implant:

  •     Excessive corrosion at the neck joint, which could shed toxic nano-particles into the patient’s body
  •     Pain, inflammation, tissue damage, and swelling caused by toxic metal nano-particles
  •     Allergic reaction, especially in patients with metal sensitivity
  •     Osteolysis (dissolving bone loss) caused by metal nano-particles

Complications

  •     Chronic pain in the hip joint
  •     Inflammation, swelling
  •     Less walking ability, changes in gait
  •     Metallosis (metal poisoning)
  •     Corrosion of the hip implant
  •     Tissue damage or death (necrosis)
  •     Bone loss in the hip
  •     Pseudotumors

The Stryker Rejuvenate hip implant

Stryker Rejuvenate Recall
In July 2012, Stryker voluntarily recalled its Rejuvenate and ABG II modular-neck stems from the market. The products were recalled due to reports of fretting and corrosion. According to some reports, the FDA received two adverse events linked to the recalled devices, including one in which the device was removed.

On May 28, 2012, Health Canada announced that Stryker Rejuvenate was being recalled so the instructions for use could be updated. The recall affected only Rejuvenate devices sold in Canada and was based on a reported rate of less than one percent for revisions associated with the Rejuvenate. So far, no such Stryker recall has been announced in the US.

Call the Stryker hip implant helpline for a Stryker hip replacement Lawyer Today

Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft Helpline, Infuse Bone Graft Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Stories and Sharing

 

Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft lawyers, Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft Helpline

DePuy Hip replacement helpline all Orthopedic related  dangerous device updates

Written by Injury Lawyer

 

 

May 16, 2012

. Posted in Accident Injury lawyer

Injury Lawyers  announce launch of Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft Lawsuit  Division and Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft Helpline
to educate individuals and families harmed by  off-label bone graft procedures and to help them understand the complications and how to pursue legal action with a Metronic Infuse Bone Graft Lawyer.

Medtronic faces an increasing number of product liability and personal injury lawsuit. Most recently, a Louisiana man, filed a lawsuit alleging that the company’s Infuse bone graft caused unwanted bone growth along his spinal cord, which worsened his back pain following a lumbar fusion.

The plaintiff, Martin Gavin alleges that Medtronic concealed information about the risk of complications from the Medtronic Infuse bone graft.

What is Medtronic Infuse?

Infuse, also known as bone morphogenetic protein-2, is a powerful bioengineered agent used in spinal fusion surgery. The product stimulates bone growth and eliminates the need to harvest a small amount of a patient's own bone to create a fusion between two vertebrae. As a result, it is highly popular with spine surgeons.

FDA Approved Infuse for limited use

The FDA approved Infuse in 2002 for use during anterior lumbar fusion surgeries. But as a result of slick and pressured marketing, it has been widely used off-label for a number of other types of spinal surgery, which have been found to increase the risk of severe adverse side effects.

Plaintiffs allege that they were never told that the Infuse was only approved for single-level anterior lumbar fusion, and had ever been adequately tested or approved for the type of spine surgery they underwent.

Medtronic Infuse Off Label Use

Off-label use of the Medtronic Infuse bone graft during procedures other than single-level anterior lumbar fusion have been linked to the growth of bone in those areas, leading to swelling and nerve damage.

FDA 2008 Warning

The FDA issued an alert in 2008, advising doctors not to use the Medtronic Infuse in neck or cervical spinal fusion procedures. The FDA had received numerous adverse event reports, involving potentially fatal complications that included swelling of the neck and respiratory difficulties.

U.S. Department of Justice investigation

The U.S. Department of Justice initiated an investigation focusing on the actions of Medtronic in 2008. The U.S DOJ was particularly interested in investigating whether Medtronic illegally promoted and marketed the Infuse bone graft for uses that were never approved by the FDA.

Other Medtronic Infuse Side Effects

Last year, concerns also emerged that the Medtronic Infuse bone graft may increase the risk of cancer. There have also been concerns that med treated with Medtronic Infuse may face a risk of sterility.

Shareholders said Infuse sales and Medtronic's share price fell after the company revealed that the U.S. Department of Justice was probing off-label marketing and the U.S. Senate began its own inquiry.

he Infuse Bone Graft is  manufactured by Medtronic. The infuse Bone Graft is a  biologically-engineered protein (known as rhBMP-2) that is used to promote bone growth and replace damaged spinal discs. It is used in conjunction with a metallic cage implant (LT-Cage Device) that works to stabilize the spine as the new bone grows. Infuse Bone Graft is designed to reduce the pain and complications that are associated with treating degenerative disc disease (DDD) by eliminating the second surgery that is typically required to remove bone from a patient’s hip for transplantation to the spine for repair.

FDA Alerts on the Infuse Bone Graft

The FDA put special emphasis on the fact ”that the safety and effectiveness of rhBMP in the cervical spine have not been demonstrated and these products are not approved by FDA for this use.”

The FDA stated that they had received at least 38 reports of complications during the last 4 years with the use of rhBMP in cervical spine fusion. These complications were associated with swelling of neck and throat tissue, which resulted in compression of the airway and/or neurological structures in the neck. Some reports describe difficulty swallowing, breathing or speaking. Severe dysphagia following cervical spine fusion using rhBMP products has also been reported in the literature.

The Infuse Bone graft has been Approved for

DDD occurs when a spinal disc deteriorates to the point of causing back pain, a diagnosis that must be confirmed by history and x-rays. Spinal fusion is a surgical method used to treat DDD and involves removing the damaged disc and replacing it with bone graft that will fuse – or join – the two adjacent vertebrae together in order to stabilize the spine. Infuse Bone Graft is used in over 100,000 U.S. spinal fusion surgeries each year.

Infuse Bone Graft is currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in anterior spinal fusion of the lumbar spine, as well as for the repair of open tibial shaft fractures and two minor dental procedures.

                                                                 Infuse Bone Graft should not be used  for

  • Women who are pregnant or who suspect pregnancy
  • Individuals with infections near the area of the surgical incision
  • Individuals who have had a tumor removed from the area of the implantation site
  • Individuals who currently have tumors in or near the area of the implantation site
  • Individuals whose bones have not stopped growing
  • Individuals who are sensitive to titanium, titanium alloy, bovine (cow) Type I collagen or rhBMP-2.

The Infuse Bone graft is being Used for off label not FDA approved Use

The FDA originally approved Infuse Bone Graft in 2002 but as with many drugs and devices, off-label use of Infuse Bone Graft was permitted once the device received FDA approval. The practice of using a drug or device off-label is permitted if physicians believe it will benefit their patients and if they fully advise their patients of the risks associated with the off-label use. In July of 2008, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a warning to healthcare providers about reported life-threatening complications associated with the off-label use of Infuse Bone Graft for cervical (neck) spinal fusions. This warning was issued in response to 38 reports of complications received by the FDA between 2004 and 2008. These complications include neck and throat swelling leading to airway compression, swallowing and breathing difficulties, as well as problems with speech. In the warning, the FDA noted that “the safety and effectiveness of rhBMP in the cervical spine have not been demonstrated and these products are not approved by FDA for this use.”

Infuse Bone Graft lawyers are Filing lawsuits for complications from the infuse bone graft

The Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft has been linked to life-threatening complications in patients who were given Medtronic off-label. Medtronic bone graft complications include swelling of the airways, which can cause difficulty breathing, speaking and swallowing. Medtronic Infuse has also been linked to retrograde ejaculation which can lead to male sterility. A number of Medtronic lawsuits allege the manufacturer illegally promoted the Medtronic bone product for off-label uses.

Speak to  a Medtronic Bone Graft Lawyer

If you or someone you know has experienced complications after being treated with a Medtronic bone growth product call the medtronic Bone graft helpline today. Our lawyers   are  currently reviewing  Medtronic lawsuits nationwide.

 

 

 

 

DePuy Hip Replacement Lawyers Filing DePuy Lawsuits

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Stories and Sharing

DePuy Hip Replacement Helpline is reaching out to all victims of a failed DePuy to watch the statute of limitations. It is time to file your DePuy Lawsuits, If you have had revision surgery, or have been told you need revision sugery fir your failed DePuy Hip Replacement contact us today, We are also looking at cases for cobalt and chromium toxicity. See the interesting article on the Depuy Lawsuit statute of Limitations below. NOTE : We are also accepting Stryker Hip replacement lawsuits for the Stryker hip replacement recall.

Will DePuy ASR Hip Implant Claims be Paid Once the Statute of Limitations Has Passed?
The DePuy ASR hip implant claims are being directed through Broadspire, a leading third-party administrator to employers and insurance companies. Few of those harmed by the implant are fully cognizant of the extreme level of sophistication of such firms. Johnson & Johnson and DePuy have engaged Broadspire to engage in damage control as well as downplay the public outcry regarding the huge 2010 hip implant recall. In its role as a risk management firm, Broadspire will use the claimant data related to medical reimbursement requests to garner as much knowledge about the patients as possible.

 Will Broadspire Continue to Pay Benefits on the DePuy Lawsuits?

Those recipients of hip implants who are in the throes of adverse medical events related to the hip implant should take a look at Broadspire’s website in order to fully grasp the levels the company will go to in order to use privileged medical records for the benefit of their client, Johnson & Johnson and DePuy. The Broadspire website additionally boasts of an entire panel of medical professionals at their disposal leaving one to wonder how critical patient medical files will end up being used against the victims.  Since many of those harmed by the hip implant system currently rely on the reimbursement benefits which help cover co-pays and deductibles, they are questioning whether those benefits will continue.  In other words, will Broadspire continue to pay those benefits following the statute of limitations in August of 2012?

 Is DePuy Hip Replacement the Reimbursement Process Contractual?

The reimbursement process currently in place for those who have suffered medical issues due to the metal-on-metal hip implant is neither a contractual nor promised benefit therefore can be withdrawn or changed at virtually any time by Johnson & Johnson and DePuy. It has been speculated that the sole purpose of Broadspire’s reimbursement program is to exert influence on victims of hip implants persuading them to forego the pursuit of a legal claim. For those claimants who may be barred from a civil claim due to the statute of limitations the question remains as to whether DePuy and Johnson & Johnson will hold up their ethical end of the bargain and continue to pay these reimbursements.

 The Harmful Effects of Metallosis and Cobalt, Chromium Toxicity

 For those recipients of the metal-on-metal hip implant who have suffered metal toxicity, it’s important to note that the specific injuries associated are quite significant yet may not manifest for three to six years following implantation. Kidney and liver disease as well as certain types of cancer may occur as a result of the toxic metal buildup in the bloodstream but victims may not be aware of these serious diseases until much later. This means that many of those who have a hip implant may not fully recognize the extent of their injuries until after the expiration of the time limits, leaving them with little recourse. These victims deserve the same compensation for medical expenses, lost wages and pain and suffering that any victim does, yet may find that avenue lost to them forever.

 The Risk to patients with a failed DePuy Hip Recall injury

 Since the law does not specifically mandate that Johnson & Johnson and DePuy make the reimbursement payments beyond the statute of limitations, it stands to reason that they will direct Broadspire to discontinue those payments. Should recipients of hip implant systems who are currently receiving reimbursement payments risk losing those payments? Unfortunately there is nothing in writing that will prohibit these corporate giants from ceasing payments. The highly experienced attorneys who have extensive knowledge of the entire metal-on-metal hip lawsuits believe future considerations and medical expenses may be discounted unless these corporations are held legally accountable.

 It is not advisable for any victim of a metal hip implant to trust in the word of DePuy and Johnson & Johnson when there is no legal mechanism in place to force them to back up that word. Recipients of the metal implants may have been exposed to much higher than normal levels of chromium and cobalt which can alter their health and their future. Some of the long-term effects from such exposure include decreased kidney function, adverse neurological effects, cardiovascular issues, hearing problems, lymphoma or disease of the thyroid gland. Because each individual’s case is unique, it must be evaluated on the specific characteristics and injury suffered.

 Broadspire Already Denying Legitimate DePuy Hip Replacement Claims

 Many victims of the metal-on-metal hip implant find they have suffered significant decreases in their vitality, energy and overall health status. Tissue damage and necrosis or joint damage may have resulted by the time the diagnosis is made, leading to significant impairment of mobility and range of motion. Many recipients of these devices find they are no longer able to enjoy the activities and hobbies they once did and may not even be able to perform routine day-to-day tasks. Even so, Broadspire has routinely denied reimbursements based only on their opinion that the injuries were not directly relatable to the defective hip implant. Though the patients’ physicians have gone to bat for them, disagreeing with such arbitrary assessments, Broadspire continues to sidestep their client’s responsibility. Several victims of the hip implant have claimed significant bone loss and joint destruction only to find that Broadspire disallowed their claims, calling the injuries “chronic.”

 Statute of Limitations Variations for the DePuy lawsuits

At least twenty-eight states have product liability statutes of limitation which are two years or less, therefore for unrepresented victims of the metal-on-metal hip implant, the time could be short and legal representation is encouraged. As with many defective medical products, the legal restrictions and protections afforded the corporations could potentially leave many hip implant victims with few options or legal recourse.

To file your DePuy Hip replacement lawsuit call the Helpline today.

NEW HIP REPLACEMENT RECALL NEWS

New Stryker Hip Replacement Recall, Metal Components Hip Replacement
Stryker Orthopaedics Recalls Rejuvenate Modular Hip System

New Stryker Hip Replacement Helpline and Stryker hip replacement lawyers offering help to people with a failed Stryker hip replacement

In July 2012, Stryker Orthopaedics voluntarily recalled its Rejuvenate Modular Hip System. The recall includes both Stryker’s Rejuvenate Modular and ABG II modular-neck hip stems.
Probelms include:

  •     Joint loosening and dislocation of the connecting joint
  •     corrosion and fretting of the device
  •     metal debris leading to metal  toxicity
  •     Inflammation of  surrounding tissue
  •     allergic response
  •     Broken devices in the hip after the surgery

DePuy MDL Status Reports, DePuy Hip Replacement Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Depuy Hip Replacement News

DePuy Hip Replacement Helpline Reports On Upcoming DePuy ASR MDL Status Conference Set For July 25, 2012

 On June 11, 2012, the Honorable David A. Katz, who is overseeing  the DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. ASR Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation ("MDL No. 2197"), currently  ongoing in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, issued an order scheduling the next status conference in the DePuy ASR MDL for July 25, 2012 at the Carl B. Stokes U.S. Courthouse in Cleveland, Ohio.The  bellwether trials of metal on metal hip replacement lawsuits In DePuy ASR Hip MDL  will be  scheduled.

The last DePuy ASR MDL status conference was held on June 5, 2012 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The lawyers leading the litigation are working to schedule first bellwether trials. The first federal bellwether trial is expected to take place in Spring 2013. The first state court trial is scheduled to take place in Nevada in December 2012, with another state court trial set for January 2013 in Maryland.

DePuy Hip replacement Helpline is reaching out to all victims of the metal on metal hip replacements to contact a DePuy Hip Replacement lawyer and the DePuy Hip Replacement Helpline.

DePuy Hip Replacement Helpline lawyers are currently filing hip replacement lawsuits in the DePuy ASR MDL. They are also reviewing cases for metal-on-metal DePuy Pinnacle hip replacements. There is a current DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation ("MDL No. 2244"), which is currently underway in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. There is also a current metal hip implant by Wright Medical Technology, Inc. Thus is the  Wright Conserve hip replacement  which has beeb consolidated in In re: Wright Medical Technology, Inc., Conserve Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation ("MDL No. 2329").   This  is now pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

DePuy Hip Replacement Helpline and the DePuy Recall lawyers want to hear from you without delay.

J & J News Update, DePuy Hip Replacement Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Depuy Hip Replacement News

DePuy Hip Replacement Helpline Breaking News. De Puy Hip Replacement Lawyers still accepting lawsuits for a failed DePuy. Johnson & Johnson will complete its $19.7 billion acquisition of Synthes tomorrow, closing its largest deal ever.
The Synthes purchase allows Johnson & Johnson to move more aggressively into the orthopedic surgery market. Swiss Synthes makes a wide variety of medical devices, from metal disks that fit into spinal cords to plates used to fuse broken bones together. To receive approval from both U.S. and European regulators, Johnson & Johnson agreed to divest its DePuy Orthopaedics subsidiary to Biomet.

J & J is  recognized for their business acumen but, what about all the victims injured by their product ? As  geriatric social worker I have great concern for seniors having to go thru numerous revision surgeries for their De Puy Hip Replacement. If you have a metal on metal hip replacement and have had or have been told you need revision surgery or have metal on metal toxicity call the DePuy Hip Replacement Helpline today. You must speak to a De Puy recall lawyer.